fasti battle
el mismo año · cada cómputo
a.c.
390 a.c.
a.e.c.
390 a.e.c.
a.u.c.
ccclxiv
b.p.
2340
era holocena
9611
olimpiada
97.ª · año 3
anno mundi
3372
18 · july río alia

the dies alliensis and the gallic massacre

dies alliensis

on an 18 july, beside the river alia, the senones broke the legions almost without a battle and left rome defenceless against the sack. the trauma ran so deep that the date was marked in black on the calendar, as the day when rome refused to fight.

remains of the servian wall of rome, the fortification raised after the gallic sack that followed the disaster at the alia
joris van rooden · public domain

there was a single day of the year on which the most disciplined army of antiquity refused to enter combat, paralysed by the memory of the worst defeat in its history.

it happened on a day like today, an 18 july. the year, according to traditional roman chronology, was 390 before our era; modern historians place it rather towards 387. livy relates that the trigger was a diplomatic blunder: some roman ambassadors of the fabian family, sent to mediate in etruscan clusium, broke the law of nations by taking up arms against the very gauls they were meant to appease. offended, the senones —a celtic people settled in the north of italy— left clusium in peace and marched directly on rome.

the legions marched out to block their path beside the river alia, a tributary of the tiber eleven roman miles from the city. in command were not consuls but military tribunes with consular power. confident after recent victories, they raised no fortified camp and kept no reserves. the gauls charged head-on, the roman wing broke almost before the clash, and panic did the rest: part of the army fled towards veii, part drowned trying to cross the tiber in full armour.

it was not a battle: it was a rout.

a few days later, the gauls entered an almost defenceless rome and sacked it. livy adds the scene rome would recount for centuries: the eldest senators, who had no room in the citadel, awaited the invaders seated on their ivory chairs, motionless as statues, until a gaul tugged at a beard to check whether they were alive and the spell broke into slaughter. only the citadel of the capitol held out, which tradition says was saved from a night assault by the honking of juno’s sacred geese. much of the city burned and with it, according to that same tradition, a great part of the archives. the gallic chieftain, brennus, agreed to leave in exchange for a thousand pounds of gold; and when the romans protested at the rigged scales, livy has him fling his sword onto the weights and utter the harshest phrase rome would ever hear: “vae victis”, woe to the vanquished.

the blow was so deep that rome marked 18 july in black. the dies alliensis remained an ill-omened date: forbidden to convene assemblies, to perform certain rites, to give battle. centuries later, aulus gellius still cited it among the calendar’s days of ill omen, when for generations no one in rome had seen a senonian.

the historiographical nuance, as always, trims the legend. the traditional date of 390 comes from varronian chronology; the synchronisms with the greek sources point to 387. archaeology, moreover, finds beneath rome no layer of general destruction such as the account suggests: the confirmed fires are localised. and much of the narrative —the divine punishment, the redemption by camillus— is a reconstruction by later annalists, who needed to turn the humiliation into a moral lesson. the defeat, that much is certain, no one invented.

the scar remained, which is what matters: a day of the year on which the most warlike city of the mediterranean refused, out of pure inherited fear, to take up arms. rome came to forgive almost everything, except that the calendar reminded it it had once run.

⁕ ⁕ ⁕ apparatus ⁕ ⁕ ⁕

fontes classicae.

  1. i. livy · ab urbe condita v, 37-39 y vi, 1
  2. ii. plutarch · vidas paralelas · camilo 18-22
  3. iii. aulus gellius · noches áticas v, 17

modern bibliography.

  1. i. t. j. cornell · the beginnings of rome

transitus

dídac
⁕ about the author ⁕

dídac

software engineer, history communicator. writes about ancient political history and the rage his own century gives him. building an encyclopædia romana on the internet — and a few rooms more.