encyclopædia battles ·
the same year · every reckoning
bc
249 bc
bce
249 bce
a.u.c.
dv
b.p.
2,199
holocene era
9,752
olympiad
132 · year 4
anno mundi
3,513

the sacred chickens and the disaster at drepana

proelium drepanitanum

the anecdote is famous: a consul throws the augural chickens overboard and loses the fleet the same day. the defeat was real and catastrophic; the scene with the chickens is told by cicero two centuries later, and polybius does not so much as mention it.

eighteenth-century engraving of the naval battle of drepana, with the carthaginian fleet leaving the harbour
engraving from «histoire de polybe», translated by dom vincent thuillier · public domain
period
middle republic

the story everyone remembers says that rome lost an entire fleet because a consul lost his temper with some chickens that would not eat their breakfast. the defeat is strictly true. with the scene of the chickens one has to be more careful.

the year is 249 bce. after a decade of naval disasters, rome was keeping its navy afloat with difficulty, and from the blockade of lilybaeum it was preparing a surprise strike against drepana, the carthaginian harbour at the western tip of sicily. in command was the consul publius claudius pulcher.

before a battle, roman religion required that the will of the gods be consulted through the pulli, the sacred chickens that travelled with the army. if they ate greedily and let grain fall from their beaks —the tripudium solistimum— the omen was favourable; if they refused to eat, it was not. according to cicero, that morning the chickens did not eat, and claudius pulcher had them thrown overboard with a line that became famous: if they will not eat, let them drink.

the defeat is in polybius. the chickens are not.

and there is the nuance that is almost always lost. the one who tells the anecdote is cicero in de natura deorum, writing two centuries after the event and with an argumentative purpose of his own: he is discussing divination, and the episode serves him as an example. polybius, the source closest to the war and the best informed about it, narrates the battle of drepana in detail and never mentions the chickens at any point. that does not prove the story false —the contempt of the claudii for religious form was a commonplace of roman propaganda— but it does make it a later tradition rather than a dispatch from the campaign.

what is documented is the defeat, and no impiety was needed to explain it. the roman fleet entered the bay of drepana in disorder and without having scouted the ground. the carthaginian admiral adherbal, instead of letting himself be bottled up, took his ships out through the harbour’s other exit, won the open sea and pinned the romans against the coast itself, with no room to manoeuvre or to row. carthage captured or sank ninety-three ships. it was the only great carthaginian naval victory of the entire war.

rome was left without a fleet, without public money to rebuild it and with morale on the floor. claudius pulcher was prosecuted on his return. and a couple of years later, with the war stalled in sicily, carthage would put the command of the island in the hands of a general who would turn the life of the legions into a hell: hamilcar barca, the father of hannibal.

⁕ video chapters ⁕
@yodidac · tiktok the sacred chickens and the disaster at drepana play
@yodidac
read transcript (original audio in spanish)

Roma perdió toda una flota y miles de hombres porque un cónsul se enfadó con unos simples pollos que no querían desayunar. Día 57 construyendo la mayor enciclopedia de Roma en internet. Corría el año 249 antes de nuestra era. Roma mantenía a flote una armada a duras penas, tras años de desastres navales, y desde el bloqueo de Lilibeo se preparaba para asestar un golpe sorpresa al puerto cartaginés de Drépano, en Sicilia. El comandante era el arrogante cónsul Publio Claudio Pulcro. Antes de cualquier batalla, la religión romana obligaba a consultar la voluntad de los dioses alimentando a los pollos sagrados. Si comían rápido, los dioses daban luz verde; si se negaban, era un presagio de muerte. Lo cuenta Cicerón siglos después —Polibio, la fuente más cercana a la guerra, ni lo menciona—: aquella mañana, a bordo de la nave insignia, los pollos se negaron a comer. En un arranque de furia e impiedad, Claudio Pulcro agarró a los animales y los tiró por la borda gritando: _"Si no quieren comer, que beban"_. Los dioses, aparentemente, tomaron nota. La flota romana entró desordenadamente en la bahía de Drépano. El almirante cartaginés Aderbal maniobró con una precisión brillante, sacó sus naves al mar abierto y acorraló a los romanos contra la costa. Fue una derrota humillante: Cartago capturó o hundió noventa y tres naves romanas casi sin despeinarse. Roma se quedó sin flota, sin dinero para reconstruirla, y con la moral destrozada por el sacrilegio de su cónsul. Y un par de años después, con la guerra ya estancada, Cartago confiaría el mando de Sicilia a un general que convertiría la vida de las legiones en un puro infierno. Mañana, día 58.

⁕ ⁕ ⁕ apparatus ⁕ ⁕ ⁕

fontes classicae.

  1. i. polybius · histories book i, 49-51
  2. ii. cicero · de natura deorum book ii, 7

modern bibliography.

  1. i. adrian goldsworthy · the punic wars
dídac
⁕ about the author ⁕

dídac

software engineer, history communicator. writes about ancient political history and the rage his own century gives him. building an encyclopædia romana on the internet — and a few rooms more.